After breast cancer, live birth may increase overall survival.

 

After breast cancer, live birth may increase overall survival






According to a study presented at ESHRE 2022, women who become pregnant and give birth to a live child after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis may experience better overall survival (OS) results than women who do not give birth to live children after receiving a diagnosis.

According to research author Professor Richard Anderson of the Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, "our analysis showed that having a baby after breast cancer doesn't have a negative influence on survival."

According to Anderson and co-authors, "OS was elevated among women who had a live birth after breast cancer, especially in those aged 30 [years] at diagnosis and without a previous live birth."

The authors located 5,181 women under the age of 40 who received a breast cancer diagnosis between 1981 and 2017 using data from the Scottish Cancer Registry (n = 5,181). Up until the end of 2018, pregnancies were included, and the study entry date was the date of the live birth.

290 ladies gave birth to live children after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis. Each breast cancer patient who gave birth alive was matched with up to six control cases (no live birth) who had received a breast cancer diagnosis in the same year and were still living when the matched patient gave birth alive.

Following a breast cancer diagnosis, OS was better for women who gave birth to a live child compared to those who did not (hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.50-0.85; p=0.0015). Abstract O-196 from ESHRE 2022

This enhanced survival among post-cancer live-birthing women was only shown in those who had not been pregnant before receiving a breast cancer diagnosis (HR, 0.56, 95 percent CI, 0.38-0.82, p=0.003) and not in those who had (HR, 0.76, 95 percent CI, 0.53–1.09).

Regardless of whether the cancer was discovered at stage 1 (HR, 0.74, 95 per cent CI, 0.40-1.35) or stage 2-3, there did not seem to be a substantial survival benefit following live birth when breast cancer was evaluated by stage (HR, 0.71, 95 per cent CI, 0.37–1.37).

The impact of better OS following a live delivery varied by age, with the highest impact shown in women diagnosed with cancer between the ages of 20 and 25 (HR, 0.30, 95 per cent CI, 0.12-0.74; p=0.009) and 26 and 30 (HR, 0.58, 95 per cent CI, 0.38-0.88; p=0.011). In women diagnosed between the ages of 31 and 36 and 36 and 39, live birth did not substantially alter OS (HR, 0.67, 95 per cent CI, 0.44-1.01; p=0.057 and HR, 0.89, 95 per cent CI, 0.42-1.87; p=0.76, respectively).

The majority of women (n=182) gave birth to a live child within five years after receiving a breast cancer diagnosis, and OS was higher in this group compared to those who did not give birth to a live child after diagnosis (HR, 0.66, 95 per cent CI, 0.49-0.89; p=0.006). On the other hand, there was no OS benefit after a live birth that took place about 5 years after a cancer diagnosis (HR, 0.63, 95per cent CI, 0.36–1.13).

According to Anderson and co-authors, "being a hormone-sensitive malignancy, there has long been a worry among patients and doctors that having a subsequent pregnancy and live baby might affect recurrence and survival."

However, they noted that there is little evidence for this due to the paucity of data on patient characteristics that can affect results.

They said, "This is of increasing concern given that more women with breast cancer will not have begun or finished their family due to the rising age [of women during pregnancy]."

The growing number of women who wish to begin or finish their families after receiving breast cancer treatment will find comfort in [the study's outcomes], Anderson said.


Previous Post Next Post