You Deserve People Who Text First Too
If your chats look like a staircase of your own blue bubbles, this isn’t about being “clingy.” It’s about reciprocity. Healthy relationships include initiation from both sides—texts, plans, check-ins. Wanting that isn’t high-maintenance; it’s basic respect.
Why It Hurts More Than It Looks
- Invisible labor: planning, remembering, and nudging takes energy.
- Attachment triggers: silence can read as disinterest or rejection.
- Identity erosion: you start shrinking needs to keep the connection.
Quick Reality Checks
- Busy is real; pattern is louder. One slow week ≠ months of one-sidedness.
- Platform mismatch (DMs vs. texts) can hide effort—clarify the channel.
- Initiation style differs, but care finds a way to show up.
Set the Standard (Kindly + Clearly)
- “I love our chats. It helps me feel connected when we both reach out.”
- “I’m usually the one to text first—can you start the next check-in?”
- “If you’re swamped, a ‘thinking of you’ emoji goes a long way.”
Change the System, Not Just the Sentence
- Reduce chasing: match their pace for 2–3 weeks and observe.
- Diversify care: invest in people who already show initiative.
- Make it easy: propose two times; ask them to pick (or to propose next plan).
Green Flags vs. Red Flags
- Green: owns the feedback, initiates soon after, sets a rhythm.
- Yellow: apologises but forgets repeatedly—needs structure.
- Red: shames your need, calls you dramatic, continues to coast.
When to Step Back
If reminders become a second job, scale access—fewer updates, lower response time, or a gentle pause. Love without reciprocity becomes caretaking. You deserve mutual effort.
Final Thoughts
People who care start conversations too. Ask clearly, measure patterns, and choose connections that choose you back.
More from Ichhori:
