What does facebook think of teens?

What does facebook think of teens ichhori.com

 What does facebook think of teens 

On Tuesday, Facebook whistleblower Frances Haugen testified before a Senate panel. The hearing’s focus was announced as” protecting children online.”
“I believe that Facebook’s products harm children,” she said in her opening statement, saying that the documents she published proved that Facebook’s” profit optimizing machine is generating self-harm and self-hate especially for vulnerable groups, like teenage girls.” Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone noted on Twitter during the hearing that Haugen” did not work on child safety or Instagram or research these issues and has no direct knowledge of the content from her work on Facebook.”
 Experimenters have worked for numerous years to tease out the connection between teenagers media use and cerebral state. Although there is debate, they tend to agree that the evidence we have seen therefore far is complex, antithetical and ultimately inconclusive. That is equally true of Facebook’s internal marketing data, leaked by Haugen because it is of the validated studies on the subject.


The leaked Facebook research consists of opinion surveys and interviews. Facebook asked teenagers about their impresses of Instagram’s effect on their body image, cerebral state and other issues.
 That reliance on self-reporting the teenagers own opinions together indicator of harm could also be a drag, says Candice Odgers, a psychologist who studies adolescence at the University of California, Irvine and Duke University. That is because teenagers are already primed by media content, and therefore the disapproval of grown-ups, to believe that social media is bad for them.
 Odgers was co-author of a study conducted within the year 2015 and published in 2020 that found exactly this. However, the overwhelming majority say yes,” she tells NPR, “If you ask teenagers if they are addicted or harmed by social media or their phones.” But if you are doing the exploration and connect their druggies to objective measures there is little or no to no connection.” Piecemeal from a touch increase in gets problems, her study plant no world connections between smartphone or social media use and several other different measures of cerebral torture and well- being.” At the population position,” the paper concluded, “there was little substantiation that digital technology access and use is negatively associated with youthful adolescents’ well- being.”
 Small figures
Odgers paper was peer-reviewed. It had actors. It is just one of the numerous studies published over decades on children and adolescents’ media use and well-being. This exploration started with radio, moved on to television, video games and now social media. All along the way, large peer-reviewed studies have planted many correlations. It is substantially null, Odgers says.
 The Facebook exploration was not blinked- reviewed or designed to be nationally representative, and many of the statistics that have entered the foremost attention were supported by veritably small figures.
 According to Facebook’s reflections of the blurted slides, the finding astronomically reported as thirty per cent of teenage girls felt Instagram made them feel worse about their bodies” was supported by 150 respondents out of a couple of thousand Instagram druggies surveyed. They only answered the question about Instagram’s part if that they had formerly reported having body image issues. So the finding does not describe a sampling of teenage girls, or maybe all the women within the survey. It’s a subset of a subset of a subset.
 In another of the Facebook surveys, out of relatively teenage Instagram druggies surveyed within the United Kingdom and the United States of America. Sixteen total repliers reported suicidal studies that they said started with Instagram. Because of the way this data was sliced and diced in Facebook’s internal slides, those sixteen people, but one per cent of all respondents, became the last word source of stories that reported six per cent of teens in the United States of America and thirteen per cent in the United Kingdom blamed Instagram for suicidal thoughts.


 Vicky Rideout is an independent researcher who has published quite twenty-four studies on children and media use. She says it is a useless distraction to match the battle with Facebook to the showdown over Big Tobacco, as legislators are doing at these sounds. That is for two reasons because the substantiation is nowhere near as strong, and since social media unlike cigarettes are again and again beneficial also as dangerous.
 One of Rideout’s 2021 studies on teens, unlike Facebook’s internal findings, used a nationally representative sample and used an honoured scale to measure depression. In her study, forty-three per cent of respondents said using social media generally makes them feel more, not worse when they are depressed, stressed or anxious. Less than half as numerous seventeen per cent said it always makes them feel worse. The rest said it makes no difference either way.
 Rideout’s research suggests that there is a little group of oppressively depressed teenagers for whom social media features a bigger impact for better and for worse. She thinks they ought to be the attention of future research.
Both Rideout and Odgers say that rather of grinding to a halt in an endless circle of room scrolling over small, inconclusive results, the general public discussion on social media and teenagers must move toward results. They would wish to ascertain companies like Facebook put resources toward designing and testing positive interventions.
 Some ideas researchers are presently looking at connecting children with information about psychological wellness or health; promoting accounts that are shown to form people feel better about themselves; or prompting teens to see in with peers who are having a rough day.
“There are plenty of teenagers suffering from depression, which they’re doing use plenty of social media, and social media does play an outsized role in their lives, “says Rideout. However, that is something we should always support, “If there is a concrete way that Instagram or the opposite social media company can fancy elevate the positive and diminish the negative aspects of their platforms.”

Previous Post Next Post